|
Manufacturers of infant formula have a long and
sordid reputation for engaging in deceptive
marketing techniques and advertising campaigns.
So it should come as little surprise to
breastfeeding advocates that formula companies
are once again being challenged for deceiving
the public. What may be surprising,
though, is that this time around it is a
watchdog organization for family farmers that
set the critical ball rolling.
The Cornucopia Institute, a Wisconsin-based farm
and food policy research group that promotes
sustainability and advocates for economic
justice for family farmers, joined forces with
NABA (The National Alliance for Breastfeeding
Advocacy) in releasing a report late last month
called “Replacing Mother – Imitating Human
Breast Milk in the Laboratory.”
Cornucopia began their inquiry based on the
discovery that certain omega fatty acids were
being added to organic infant formulas, in
violation of national organic standards. As
they dug deeper, they discovered that the same
additives – now found in about 90 percent of
infant formulas - were making some babies quite
sick: explosive diarrhea, vomiting, stomach
pain and other gastrointestinal problems. Yet
the formula products contain no warning labels
to inform parents of the risk.
DHA (an omega-3 fatty acid) and ARA, an omega-6
fatty acid are both are naturally present in
mothers’ milk and necessary for proper growth
and development. But in the case of infant
formula, the report asserts, the oils are
extracted from fermented algae and fungus, with
the use of the synthetic solvent hexane (a
neurotoxic chemical that violates national
organic standards). Contrary to marketing
claims, these oils are a far cry from those
found in breastmilk.
Basing their conclusions upon reading through
hundreds of adverse reactions reports filed with
the FDA, Charlotte Vallaeys, Farm and Food
Policy Analyst with the Cornucopia Institute and
lead author of the report, explains: “We
investigated how a toxic chemical is used as
processing agents in the manufacturing process,
the inadequate testing for safety, and most
importantly, how some infants are experiencing
serious adverse reactions from consuming formula
supplemented with these oils.”
In a subsequent telephone interview, Vallaeys
adds: “Right now, if a parent is giving DHA
formula, they have no way of knowing that there
is even a possibility that their baby can’t
digest these oils and could develop diarrhea.
There is no way of knowing that switching to a
non-DHA formula could potentially eliminate
their problems…It was shocking to us that so
many of these reports had come into the FDA and
nobody really knew about it.”
The FDA has the authority
to require formula makers to put a warning label
on their products. The Cornucopia Institute and
the National Alliance for Breastfeeding Advocacy
therefore have filed a petition with the FDA,
urging them to require a label notice for all
infant food products containing DHA and ARA
oils. Consumers are also encouraged to contact
the FDA. Send an e-mail to
commissioner@fda.gov
or mail a letter to the following address:
Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach; Food and
Drug Administration; 5600 Fishers Lane;
Rockville, Maryland 20857. A sample letter is
available at
http://cornucopia.org/index.php/take-action/.
The full report is available at: http://cornucopia.org/index.php/replacing-mother-infant-formula-report/.
In addition, parents whose
babies have experience negative reactions are
encouraged to report their experience to the
FDA’s Safety Information and Adverse Event
Reporting Program, accessed at the following
site:
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/medwatch/medwatch-online.htm.
Back to Parents'Lounge Research Updates
Back to The Clinicians' Corner News and Research
Updates |